OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
46.7Performance27.1
52.5Display36.6
53Camera30.1
57.3Battery55.7
60Features65.3
12 spec wins — OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 52.6 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+23) and performance (+20). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 53 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 53 vs 30
- 220% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 25 W
- 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2412x1080 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi+2% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits+19% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 93 %+9% | 85.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 509,232Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 210,242Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,774Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,272Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,944Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 740Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,050Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP+60% | 5 MP |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x+100% | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh+9% |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 181 g+9% | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm+4% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno11 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno11 Pro 5Gvs Honor X9cVSOPPO Reno11 Pro 5Gvs Huawei nova 16 SEVSOPPO Reno11 Pro 5Gvs Huawei P60 ProVSOPPO Reno11 Pro 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6VSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs vivo Y600iVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO M6 Plus 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Lava Play Ultra 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X7eVS