Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A35

OPPO Reno12 F 4G
42.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
28.9Performance31.4
58.3Display45.3
34.1Camera41.9
52.5Battery55.7
46.7Features70.7
8 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 4G2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy A35 wins this phone face-off, 45.1 to 42.3, pulling ahead mainly in features (+24) and camera (+8). OPPO Reno12 F 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 4G

  • Stronger display score: 58 vs 45
  • 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
  • 110% higher Peak brightness: 2,100 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
  • 11% lower weight: 187 g vs 209 g

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Stronger camera score: 42 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 56 vs 53
  • Stronger features score: 71 vs 47
  • Has OIS — the other doesn't
  • Has 5G — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.67 ″+1%6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801080x2340
Pixel density394 ppi+1%390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,100 nits+110%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body92.2 %+9%84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetSnapdragon 685Samsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu—743,075Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—292,456Bottom 21%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,904Bottom 18%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—133,634Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—229,081Bottom 21%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,950Bottom 38%
RAM (max)8 GB8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Optical zoom—1 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W+80%25 W
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight187 g+11%209 g
Thickness7.7 mm+6%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP64IP67
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.05.3
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 14 (ColorOS 14)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno12 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno12 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

OPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs iPhone 12 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs Motorola Moto G Power (2026)VSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs vivo V30eVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs POCO X3 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS

Try another matchup