OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
28.9Performance86.1
58.3Display61.6
34.1Camera50.2
52.5Battery67.5
46.7Features94.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 4G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 wins this phone face-off, 71.2 to 42.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and features (+48). OPPO Reno12 F 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 4G
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 21% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 9.7 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger performance score: 86 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 62 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 50 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 68 vs 53
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 47
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 7.6 ″+14% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2448x1848 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 404 ppi+3% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 3,000 nits+43% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 %+3% | 89.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 685 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,947,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,528Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,619Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 53 %Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+4% | 4,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 20 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+7% | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+21% | 9.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs iPhone 12 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs Motorola Moto G Power (2026)VSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs vivo V30eVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs POCO X3 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS