OPPO Reno12 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
25.3Performance34.7
58.3Display46.2
34.1Camera41.7
52.5Battery52.5
86.7Features89.3
4 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 5G4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G wins this phone face-off, 47.4 to 45.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+9) and camera (+8). OPPO Reno12 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 5G
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 46
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 75% higher Peak brightness: 2,100 nits vs 1,200 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger performance score: 35 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 42 vs 34
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,902 vs 2,004
- 29% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,016 vs 790
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi+2% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits+75% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTu | — | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 790Bottom 20% | 1,016+29%Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,004Bottom 17% | 2,902+45%Bottom 35% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Max video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 0 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+4% | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.4 mm+5% |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme P3 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs TECNO CAMON 30S ProVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS