OPPO Reno12 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
25.3Performance29.1
58.3Display54
34.1Camera65.9
52.5Battery55.1
86.7Features73.3
3 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 5G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 51.1 to 45.2, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and performance (+4). OPPO Reno12 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 5G
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 75% higher Peak brightness: 2,100 nits vs 1,200 nits
- 16% lower weight: 187 g vs 222 g
- 12% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 8.8 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 34
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 32% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,650 vs 2,004
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.9 ″+3% |
| Panel type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 511 ppi+30% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits+75% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 790Bottom 20% | 900+14%Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,004Bottom 17% | 2,650+32%Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 4 x |
| Max video | 1080p@60fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP+25% |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+16% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+12% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme P3 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs TECNO CAMON 30S ProVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VS