OPPO Reno12 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
25.3Performance90
58.3Display62.7
34.1Camera74
52.5Battery61.2
86.7Features94.7
3 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 5G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 76 to 45.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+65) and camera (+40). OPPO Reno12 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 5G
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 13% lower weight: 187 g vs 214 g
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 90 vs 25
- Stronger display score: 63 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 53
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.9 ″+3% |
| Panel type | OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3120x1440 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 498 ppi+26% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 2,600 nits+24% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,437,807Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,017,509Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,344,505Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 390,717Top 19% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 685,076Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 790Bottom 20% | 3,850+387%Top 1% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,004Bottom 17% | 11,900+494%Top 1% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W+33% |
| Wireless charging | — | 25 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+13% | 214 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+2% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme P3 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs TECNO CAMON 30S ProVSOPPO Reno12 F 5Gvs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Honor 500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Redmi K100 ProVS