Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno13 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

WINNER
OPPO Reno13 F 4G
44.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
28.9Performance27.1
53.2Display34.4
34.1Camera30.1
60Battery43.7
60Features49.3
10 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 F 4G1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

InnoReviews verdict

OPPO Reno13 F 4G wins this phone face-off, 44.1 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+19) and battery (+16). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 F 4G

  • Stronger display score: 53 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 34 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 60 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 49
  • 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
Screen size6.67 ″6.7 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801080x2340
Pixel density394 ppi+2%385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits+64%733 nits
Screen-to-body92.2 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu—510,132Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—211,597Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,559Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,374Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,602Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (single)—728Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,943Bottom 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability—96 %Top 47%
RAM (max)8 GB8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP+60%5 MP
Max video1080p@60fps1080p@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OIS—No

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
Capacity5,800 mAh+16%5,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W+80%25 W

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
Weight192 g+4%200 g
Thickness7.8 mm+2%7.9 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69IP54
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
5GNoNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
OS at launchAndroid 15 (ColorOS 15)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—6 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A16 4G
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup