Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno13 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A35

OPPO Reno13 F 4G
44.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
28.9Performance31.4
53.2Display45.3
34.1Camera41.9
60Battery55.7
60Features70.7
9 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 F 4G1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno13 F 4G scores 44.1 against 45.1 for Samsung Galaxy A35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy A35 edges ahead in features and camera, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 F 4G

  • Stronger display score: 53 vs 45
  • Stronger battery score: 60 vs 56
  • 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
  • 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
  • 20% higher Peak brightness: 1,200 nits vs 1,000 nits

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Stronger camera score: 42 vs 34
  • Stronger features score: 71 vs 60
  • Has 5G — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.67 ″+1%6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801080x2340
Pixel density394 ppi+1%390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits+20%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body92.2 %+9%84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100Samsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu—743,075Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—292,456Bottom 21%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,904Bottom 18%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—133,634Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—229,081Bottom 21%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,950Bottom 38%
RAM (max)8 GB8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Optical zoom—1 x
Max video1080p@60fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity5,800 mAh+16%5,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W+80%25 W
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight192 g+8%209 g
Thickness7.8 mm+5%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69IP67
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 15 (ColorOS 15)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup