Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno13 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8

OPPO Reno13 F 4G
44.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
71.2Inno Score
28.9Performance86.1
53.2Display61.6
34.1Camera50.2
60Battery67.5
60Features94.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 F 4G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 wins this phone face-off, 71.2 to 44.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and features (+35). OPPO Reno13 F 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 F 4G

  • 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
  • 21% higher capacity: 5,800 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
  • 20% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 9.7 mm

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8

  • Stronger performance score: 86 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 62 vs 53
  • Stronger camera score: 50 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 68 vs 60
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Screen size6.67 ″7.6 ″+14%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution2400x10802448x1848
Pixel density394 ppi404 ppi+3%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,000 nits+150%
Screen-to-body92.2 %+3%89.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
AnTuTu—2,947,517
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,528Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,619Top 4%
Wild Life Extreme stability—53 %Bottom 11%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options256GB / 512GB256GB/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Max video1080p@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+220%10 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Capacity5,800 mAh+21%4,800 mAh
Wired charging45 W45 W
Wireless charging—20 W
Active use endurance—13.8 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Weight192 g+4%201 g
Thickness7.8 mm+20%9.7 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69IP48
Frame material—Armor Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
OS at launchAndroid 15 (ColorOS 15)Android 17 (One UI 9)
OS update pledge—7 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno13 F 4G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
SpecOPPO Reno13 F 4GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup