OPPO Reno13 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
25.3Performance29.1
53.2Display54
45.9Camera65.9
60Battery55.1
100Features73.3
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 F 5G5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 51.1 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+20) and performance (+4). OPPO Reno13 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 F 5G
- Stronger battery score: 60 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 16% higher capacity: 5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 14% lower weight: 192 g vs 222 g
- 12% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 8.8 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 46
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 30% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 394 ppi
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.9 ″+3% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 511 ppi+30% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 934+4%Bottom 25% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,703+2%Bottom 29% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 4 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,800 mAh+16% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 192 g+14% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+12% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (ColorOS 15) | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs Motorola Razr (2026)VSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VS

