OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
46.7Performance20
55Display36
61.4Camera33.1
79.8Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
10 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 F 5G wins this phone face-off, 60.6 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+41) and features (+35). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″+3% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 411 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits+75% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300-Energy | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | — | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+150% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+40% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+433% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g | 184 g+6% |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | — |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS