OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
46.7Performance29.1
55Display55.1
61.4Camera56.4
79.8Battery41.7
73.3Features73.3
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 F 5G wins this phone face-off, 60.6 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+38) and performance (+18). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 42
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 43% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.5 x
- 25% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 397 ppi
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.9 ″+5% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 496 ppi+25% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,500 nits+7% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300-Energy | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 5 x+43% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+56% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+6% | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.1 mm+4% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS

