OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
46.7Performance29.1
55Display54
61.4Camera65.9
79.8Battery55.1
73.3Features73.3
7 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 F 5G wins this phone face-off, 60.6 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+25) and performance (+18). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 29
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 55
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 40% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 25% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 40 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 61
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 29% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 397 ppi
- 14% higher Optical zoom: 4 x vs 3.5 x
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.9 ″+5% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 511 ppi+29% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits+17% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300-Energy | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+4% | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 4 x+14% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+25% | 40 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+40% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+12% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+4% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VS