OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
46.7Performance54.3
55Display59.7
61.4Camera69.9
79.8Battery62.8
73.3Features78.7
7 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 62.6 to 60.6, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+9) and performance (+8). OPPO Reno16 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 63
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 40% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 54 vs 47
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 70 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.8 ″+4% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 1440x3088 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 501 ppi+26% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,750 nits+25% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 %+3% | 89.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300-Energy | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,677,954Bottom 50% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 550,163Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 416,322Bottom 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 277,973Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 433,496Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,000Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 5,400Top 34% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 10 x+186% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+40% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+17% | 234 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+5% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Xiaomi 13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate 70 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate XTs Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs realme 16 Pro+ 5GVS