Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra

OPPO Reno16 F 5G
60.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
46.7Performance74.3
55Display76.1
61.4Camera75.8
79.8Battery82.8
73.3Features86.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G8 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 60.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+28) and display (+21). OPPO Reno16 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G

  • 17% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • 16% lower weight: 195 g vs 232 g
  • Has eSIM — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 55
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 80
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 73

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.57 ″6.82 ″+4%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2372x10801440x3168
Pixel density397 ppi510 ppi+28%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits4,500 nits+221%
Screen-to-body92.8 %+3%90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetDimensity 7300-EnergyQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3.5 x3.7 x+6%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Capacity7,000 mAh+17%6,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W90 W+13%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Weight195 g+16%232 g
Thickness8.4 mm+3%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS

Try another matchup