Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
75.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
72.9Performance20
67.1Display36
79.1Camera33.1
85.5Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
14 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+53) and battery (+47). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G

  • Stronger performance score: 73 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 79 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size6.32 ″6.4 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2640x12162400x1080
Pixel density460 ppi+12%411 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+60%90 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits+125%800 nits
Screen-to-body93.4 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetDimensity 8550 SuperMediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu2,294,761+783%260,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—410Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,320Bottom 2%
RAM (max)12 GB+100%6 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera200 MP+213%64 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom3.5 x—
Max video4K@60fps4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+150%20 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity6,700 mAh+34%5,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W+433%15 W
Active use endurance19.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight188 g184 g+2%
Thickness8.2 mm+2%8.4 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69K—
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakers—No
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup