Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35

WINNER
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
75.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
72.9Performance31.4
67.1Display45.3
79.1Camera41.9
85.5Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
14 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and camera (+37). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G

  • Stronger performance score: 73 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 79 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 56
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.32 ″6.6 ″+4%
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2640x12161080x2340
Pixel density460 ppi+18%390 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits+80%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body93.4 %+10%84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetDimensity 8550 SuperSamsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared2,294,761743,075Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—292,456Bottom 21%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,904Bottom 18%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—133,634Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—229,081Bottom 21%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,950Bottom 38%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom3.5 x+250%1 x
Max video4K@60fps4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity6,700 mAh+34%5,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W+220%25 W
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance19.5 h+63%12 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight188 g+10%209 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP67
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS

Try another matchup