OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
72.9Performance82.4
67.1Display66
79.1Camera47.3
85.5Battery71.7
73.3Features94.7
11 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26+
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 71.2, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and battery (+14). Samsung Galaxy S26+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 72
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Stronger performance score: 82 vs 73
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 44% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,800 nits
- 12% higher Pixel density: 516 ppi vs 460 ppi
- 11% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.7 ″+6% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 3120x1440 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 516 ppi+12% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 2,600 nits+44% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 %+3% | 90.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,294,761 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,393Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 11,515Top 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x+17% | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+37% | 4,900 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 20 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h+19% | 16.4 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+1% | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.3 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8VSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS