OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
72.9Performance90
67.1Display62.7
79.1Camera74
85.5Battery61.2
73.3Features94.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G scores 75.6 against 76 for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges ahead in features and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 63
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 74
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 61
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 34% higher capacity: 6,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 90 vs 73
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 44% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,800 nits
- 43% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.5 x
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.9 ″+9% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 3120x1440 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 498 ppi+8% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 2,600 nits+44% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,294,761 | 3,437,807Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,017,509Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,344,505Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 390,717Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 685,076Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,850Top 2% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 11,900Top 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 5 x+43% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+34% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+33% | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 25 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+12% | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm+4% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Honor 500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Redmi K100 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVS