OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
72.9Performance55.2
67.1Display53.7
79.1Camera46.8
85.5Battery94.7
73.3Features60
7 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G6 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 61.6, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and performance (+18). Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger performance score: 73 vs 55
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 86
- 58% higher capacity: 10,600 mAh vs 6,700 mAh
- 50% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 80 W
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 22% higher Peak brightness: 2,200 nits vs 1,800 nits
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.67 ″+6% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 1080x2400 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+16% | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 2,200 nits+22% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| AnTuTu | 2,294,761 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,158Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 7,082Top 22% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh | 10,600 mAh+58% |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | — | 50 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+58% | 450 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+58% | 19.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 14 |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs REDMI K80 ProVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iPhone AirVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate DesignVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iQOO Z9 TurboVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraVS