Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs vivo X200 FE

WINNER
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
75.6Inno Score
VS
vivo X200 FE
67.7Inno Score
72.9Performance51.2
67.1Display76.3
79.1Camera60.5
85.5Battery85.5
73.3Features78.7
8 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G5 spec wins — vivo X200 FE

InnoReviews verdict

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 67.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+22) and camera (+19). vivo X200 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G

  • Stronger performance score: 73 vs 51
  • Stronger camera score: 79 vs 61
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 27% higher Active use endurance: 19.5 h vs 15.3 h

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE

  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
  • 178% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 13% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 80 W

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
Screen size6.32 ″6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2640x12161216x2640
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits5,000 nits+178%
Screen-to-body93.4 %+4%90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
ChipsetDimensity 8550 SuperMediaTek Dimensity 9300+
AnTuTu2,294,761—
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,960Top 35%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—6,606Top 27%
Wild Life Extreme stability—60 %Bottom 22%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.88
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3.5 x+17%3 x
Max video4K@60fps4K@60fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
Capacity6,700 mAh+3%6,500 mAh
Wired charging80 W90 W+13%
Active use endurance19.5 h+27%15.3 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
Weight188 g186 g+1%
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+3%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvivo X200 FE
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup