Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
75.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
72.9Performance93.3
67.1Display82.3
79.1Camera84.6
85.5Battery91.5
73.3Features84
4 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G9 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 75.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+20) and display (+15). OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G

  • 22% higher Active use endurance: 19.5 h vs 16 h
  • 19% lower weight: 188 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 73
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 67
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 79
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 86
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 73

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.32 ″6.82 ″+8%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2640x12161440x3168
Pixel density460 ppi510 ppi+11%
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits4,500 nits+150%
Screen-to-body93.4 %+3%90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetDimensity 8550 SuperQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu2,294,7614,085,695+78%
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3.5 x3.7 x+6%
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity6,700 mAh+2%6,600 mAh
Wired charging80 W100 W+25%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance19.5 h+22%16 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Weight188 g+19%232 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecOPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup