Oppo Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
28.9Performance80
67.2Display66.7
70.3Camera74
77Battery65.8
86.7Features94.7
5 spec wins — Oppo Reno165 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and features (+8). Oppo Reno16 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Oppo Reno16
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 66
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 38% higher Peak brightness: 3,600 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 34% higher capacity: 6,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $699 vs $1,300
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 70
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.9 ″+9% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 498 ppi+8% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+38% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 92.5 % |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 10% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 19% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 13% |
Performance
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 2,787,981Top 4% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,030Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 9,800Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 5 x+43% |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+34% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g+13% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno16vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSOppo Reno16vs POCO F7VSOppo Reno16vs OnePlus 12RVSOppo Reno16vs iPhone 15 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Vivo X200 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVS