Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
80Performance74.5
66.7Display73.2
74Camera72
65.8Battery79.9
94.7Features78.7
11 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra6 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 74.8 against 75.2 for Vivo X200 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X200 Pro edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 75
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 79
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 75% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 4 years
- 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 66
- 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+10% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 %+2% | 90.3 % |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 895,141Top 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 989,555Top 13% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 348,188Top 19% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 555,097Top 13% | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,787,981+9%Top 4% | 2,550,000Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030+8%Top 8% | 2,800Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800+14%Top 3% | 8,600Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+35% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP+167% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g+2% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+4% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+75% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs OnePlus 13VSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VSVivo X200 Provs Honor Magic7 ProVS