AnTuTu 12 vs AnTuTu 11: how the same phones' scores changed
InnoReviews · figures as of Oct 30, 2026 · 126 devices with results in both versions · AnTuTu's own rankings
In September 2026 AnTuTu moved its ranking to AnTuTu 12, and AnTuTu itself says scores from different versions are not directly comparable (AnTuTu). For 126 devices in our catalog (91 phones and 35 tablets) we hold both rows of AnTuTu's ranking, V11 and V12, for the same device. The median device scores +8.3% in AnTuTu 12.
The gain is not even. Devices that scored under 1M points in AnTuTu 11 gained a median +16.2%; those at 3M and up, +3.2%. 3 devices score more than 3% lower in AnTuTu 12 (Honor Magic7 Pro, Vivo X300 Pro, OnePlus 15T).
So the gap between the fastest and slowest phone in the sample changes: 7.9× in AnTuTu 11, 7× in AnTuTu 12. The order mostly holds: of 4,520 same-category pairs whose AnTuTu 11 totals differ by more than 3%, 73 (1.6%) swap places. Compare scores only within one version; our pages show AnTuTu 12 in its own row.
Median score change by AnTuTu 11 score band
Change = AnTuTu 12 total / AnTuTu 11 total − 1 for the same device; under each bar, the AnTuTu 11 score band and the number of devices.
Median change by launch year
| Year | Devices | Median change |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | +13.5% |
| 2022 | 4 | +17.7% |
| 2023 | 12 | +11.9% |
| 2024 | 29 | +9.2% |
| 2025 | 58 | +7.1% |
| 2026 | 16 | +5.8% |
Years with fewer than 4 devices in the sample are not shown.
Biggest gains
| Device | Chipset | AnTuTu 11 | AnTuTu 12 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redmi Pad SE2023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | 396,569 | 513,336 | +29.4% |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra2021 | Samsung Exynos 2100 | 783,817 | 997,541 | +27.3% |
| Samsung Galaxy S212021 | Samsung Exynos 2100 | 759,668 | 951,923 | +25.3% |
| Google Pixel 6a2022 | Google Tensor | 901,837 | 1,115,740 | +23.7% |
| Galaxy Tab A9+2023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | 570,788 | 693,539 | +21.5% |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G2025 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 547,742 | 659,862 | +20.5% |
| Infinix HOT 60 Pro+2025 | MediaTek Helio G200 | 582,651 | 698,891 | +20% |
| Galaxy Tab A112025 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 521,076 | 624,368 | +19.8% |
| Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)2025 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | 550,286 | 656,739 | +19.3% |
| Galaxy Tab A92023 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 515,046 | 613,863 | +19.2% |
Lower in AnTuTu 12 (by more than 3%)
| Device | Chipset | AnTuTu 11 | AnTuTu 12 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honor Magic7 Pro2024 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 2,884,817 | 2,425,577 | −15.9% |
| Vivo X300 Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | 3,326,259 | 3,100,231 | −6.8% |
| OnePlus 15T2026 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,750,408 | 3,614,466 | −3.6% |
All 126 devices
| Device | Chipset | AnTuTu 11 | AnTuTu 12 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RedMagic 11 Pro2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 4,013,168 | 4,271,879 | +6.4% |
| OnePlus Pad 42026 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,923,098 | 3,932,825 | +0.2% |
| HONOR WIN2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,936,207 | 3,891,505 | −1.1% |
| POCO F8 Ultra2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,651,476 | 3,826,193 | +4.8% |
| OnePlus 152025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,606,149 | 3,823,060 | +6% |
| Xiaomi 17 Ultra2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,600,724 | 3,804,006 | +5.6% |
| OPPO Find X9 Ultra2026 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,873,593 | 3,759,799 | −2.9% |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra2026 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | 3,463,142 | 3,748,209 | +8.2% |
| iQOO 152025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,758,268 | 3,714,346 | −1.2% |
| OnePlus 15T2026 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,750,408 | 3,614,466 | −3.6% |
| Redmi K90 Pro Max2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,622,315 | 3,565,899 | −1.6% |
| OnePlus Pad 32025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,228,966 | 3,475,976 | +7.6% |
| OPPO Find X9 Pro2025 | Dimensity 9500 | 3,328,714 | 3,434,499 | +3.2% |
| Xiaomi 172025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,248,535 | 3,419,365 | +5.3% |
| Xiaomi 17T Pro2026 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | 3,182,664 | 3,352,427 | +5.3% |
| Redmi K902025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,077,585 | 3,269,217 | +6.2% |
| POCO F8 Pro2025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,024,818 | 3,260,212 | +7.8% |
| OnePlus Ace 62025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,180,600 | 3,252,135 | +2.2% |
| Honor MagicPad 42026 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | 3,142,366 | 3,251,957 | +3.5% |
| iQOO Neo 112025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,142,473 | 3,207,292 | +2.1% |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro2025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,102,368 | 3,191,751 | +2.9% |
| Samsung Galaxy S262026 | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, China and Japan) | 2,827,538 | 3,182,842 | +12.6% |
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 2,965,121 | 3,176,445 | +7.1% |
| Xiaomi 152024 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 2,914,100 | 3,163,995 | +8.6% |
| Honor Magic8 Pro2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | 3,023,211 | 3,163,659 | +4.6% |
| iQOO 132024 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 3,038,586 | 3,128,863 | +3% |
| POCO F7 Ultra2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 2,932,885 | 3,123,155 | +6.5% |
| iQOO Z11 Turbo2026 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | 2,968,990 | 3,120,620 | +5.1% |
| Vivo X300 Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | 3,326,259 | 3,100,231 | −6.8% |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | 2,780,751 | 3,050,714 | +9.7% |
| Vivo X3002025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | 3,037,992 | 3,022,279 | −0.5% |
| OPPO Pad Mini2026 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | 2,842,723 | 3,015,765 | +6.1% |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,727,563 | 3,013,337 | +10.5% |
| Galaxy Tab S112025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,674,497 | 3,012,766 | +12.6% |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+2025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | 2,763,072 | 2,995,860 | +8.4% |
| iQOO Z10 Turbo+2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,786,169 | 2,977,927 | +6.9% |
| REDMI K80 Ultra2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,810,002 | 2,961,452 | +5.4% |
| Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.52025 | Xiaomi XRING O1 | 2,850,532 | 2,956,093 | +3.7% |
| iQOO 15R2026 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | 2,817,788 | 2,943,424 | +4.5% |
| OnePlus Ace 6T2025 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | 2,788,201 | 2,921,196 | +4.8% |
| Samsung Galaxy S252025 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | 2,583,039 | 2,869,269 | +11.1% |
| Vivo X200 Pro2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | 2,636,748 | 2,857,311 | +8.4% |
| POCO X8 Pro Max2026 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | 2,604,459 | 2,820,517 | +8.3% |
| REDMI K Pad2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,727,940 | 2,809,226 | +3% |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | 2,583,659 | 2,793,545 | +8.1% |
| vivo X200 Pro mini2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | 2,439,691 | 2,650,360 | +8.6% |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 22026 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,276,931 | 2,535,100 | +11.3% |
| Xiaomi 142023 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 2,260,412 | 2,523,970 | +11.7% |
| realme GT 72025 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | 2,415,876 | 2,515,124 | +4.1% |
| Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | 2,216,554 | 2,507,453 | +13.1% |
| iQOO Neo102024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 2,337,347 | 2,467,575 | +5.6% |
| OnePlus Ace 52024 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 2,335,804 | 2,454,683 | +5.1% |
| OPPO K13 Turbo Pro2025 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,244,450 | 2,446,908 | +9% |
| iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro2025 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,294,302 | 2,434,636 | +6.1% |
| Honor Magic7 Pro2024 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | 2,884,817 | 2,425,577 | −15.9% |
| Galaxy Tab S10+2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | 2,184,661 | 2,411,607 | +10.4% |
| POCO F72025 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,199,079 | 2,402,313 | +9.2% |
| Xiaomi 14T Pro2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | 2,129,644 | 2,385,506 | +12% |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra2024 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy | 2,201,149 | 2,378,804 | +8.1% |
| Xiaomi Pad 82025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,297,519 | 2,368,220 | +3.1% |
| iQOO Neo 102025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | 2,266,281 | 2,357,915 | +4% |
| OnePlus Pad 22024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 2,240,471 | 2,289,744 | +2.2% |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE2025 | Samsung Exynos 2400 | 2,000,659 | 2,209,433 | +10.4% |
| Xiaomi 17T2026 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | 2,026,828 | 2,185,711 | +7.8% |
| iQOO Z10 Turbo2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | 1,981,269 | 2,147,399 | +8.4% |
| realme GT 7T2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Max | 2,018,141 | 2,102,133 | +4.2% |
| POCO X8 Pro2026 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | 1,977,887 | 2,088,025 | +5.6% |
| POCO X7 Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | 1,874,182 | 2,079,680 | +11% |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro2024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,850,710 | 1,989,431 | +7.5% |
| POCO F6 Pro2024 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | 1,756,020 | 1,918,278 | +9.2% |
| Honor MagicPad 22024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,809,517 | 1,915,774 | +5.9% |
| POCO F62024 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,704,455 | 1,890,240 | +10.9% |
| Galaxy Tab S92023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | 1,701,763 | 1,882,315 | +10.6% |
| Redmi Turbo 32024 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,689,352 | 1,875,950 | +11% |
| POCO Pad X12025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | 1,716,278 | 1,856,919 | +8.2% |
| Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.42024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | 1,790,944 | 1,841,894 | +2.8% |
| Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra2023 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | 1,684,869 | 1,835,076 | +8.9% |
| iQOO Z9 Turbo2024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,668,707 | 1,834,764 | +10% |
| Samsung Galaxy S23+2023 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | 1,695,011 | 1,812,338 | +6.9% |
| iQOO Neo 10R2025 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 1,686,701 | 1,807,218 | +7.1% |
| Xiaomi Pad 72024 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | 1,666,345 | 1,791,087 | +7.5% |
| Samsung Galaxy S232023 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | 1,656,761 | 1,773,740 | +7.1% |
| Xiaomi 14T2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | 1,559,755 | 1,720,078 | +10.3% |
| Infinix GT 30 Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | 1,591,019 | 1,712,036 | +7.6% |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme | 1,537,550 | 1,703,845 | +10.8% |
| POCO X6 Pro2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | 1,525,486 | 1,696,410 | +11.2% |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | 1,510,274 | 1,682,445 | +11.4% |
| HONOR Pad V92024 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme | 1,539,362 | 1,656,835 | +7.6% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 5G2026 | Samsung Exynos 1680 | 1,359,649 | 1,469,769 | +8.1% |
| POCO F52023 | Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | 1,260,756 | 1,441,492 | +14.3% |
| Motorola Edge 702025 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | 1,336,693 | 1,434,455 | +7.3% |
| Infinix GT 20 Pro2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | 1,256,100 | 1,395,546 | +11.1% |
| Xiaomi 13T2023 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra | 1,183,282 | 1,341,818 | +13.4% |
| Xiaomi 11T Pro2021 | Snapdragon 888 | 1,035,727 | 1,154,313 | +11.4% |
| POCO F42022 | Snapdragon 870 | 961,250 | 1,134,193 | +18% |
| Google Pixel 6a2022 | Google Tensor | 901,837 | 1,115,740 | +23.7% |
| POCO F32021 | Snapdragon 870 | 998,482 | 1,111,536 | +11.3% |
| Xiaomi Pad 62023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | 951,926 | 1,066,618 | +12% |
| Infinix GT 302025 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | 906,794 | 1,002,209 | +10.5% |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra2021 | Samsung Exynos 2100 | 783,817 | 997,541 | +27.3% |
| Honor Pad 102025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 965,529 | 962,187 | −0.3% |
| Samsung Galaxy S212021 | Samsung Exynos 2100 | 759,668 | 951,923 | +25.3% |
| Xiaomi Pad 52021 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | 833,816 | 946,762 | +13.5% |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G2020 | Snapdragon 865 | 881,404 | 944,911 | +7.2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G2025 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | 816,934 | 931,828 | +14.1% |
| POCO X3 Pro2021 | Snapdragon 860 | 797,072 | 903,556 | +13.4% |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2023)2023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | 847,478 | 900,286 | +6.2% |
| Galaxy Tab A11+2025 | MediaTek MT8775 (Dimensity 7300) | 794,314 | 899,130 | +13.2% |
| Infinix NOTE Edge2026 | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | 750,153 | 849,792 | +13.3% |
| Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2024)2024 | HiSilicon Kirin 8000 | 720,605 | 805,473 | +11.8% |
| POCO M7 Pro 5G2024 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | 661,238 | 752,453 | +13.8% |
| Redmi Note 14 5G2025 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | 660,807 | 752,415 | +13.9% |
| Infinix HOT 60 Pro+2025 | MediaTek Helio G200 | 582,651 | 698,891 | +20% |
| Galaxy Tab A9+2023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | 570,788 | 693,539 | +21.5% |
| Redmi Pad 22025 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | 592,810 | 685,298 | +15.6% |
| Redmi Note 14 (4G)2025 | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra | 565,160 | 663,219 | +17.4% |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G2025 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 547,742 | 659,862 | +20.5% |
| Redmi Note 13 Pro (4G)2024 | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra | 563,419 | 657,137 | +16.6% |
| Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)2025 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | 550,286 | 656,739 | +19.3% |
| POCO M6 Pro (4G)2024 | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra | 555,618 | 653,805 | +17.7% |
| Redmi Pad2022 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 540,952 | 625,798 | +15.7% |
| Galaxy Tab A112025 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 521,076 | 624,368 | +19.8% |
| Galaxy Tab A92023 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 515,046 | 613,863 | +19.2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G2024 | MediaTek Helio G99 | 510,132 | 606,549 | +18.9% |
| Redmi Pad SE2023 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | 396,569 | 513,336 | +29.4% |
| Galaxy Tab A82022 | Unisoc T618 | 363,589 | 426,608 | +17.3% |
Context: what changed in AnTuTu 12
AnTuTu released the AnTuTu 12 public beta in September 2026 (AnTuTu). AnTuTu says V12 refines the models behind its single- and multi-core CPU tests, optimizes the graphics-processing pipeline of its GPU test, adds a dynamic latency stress test to its memory test, comprehensively upgrades its UX tests, and adds a new cooperative matrix test based on Vulkan Cooperative Matrix. As AnTuTu puts it, scores from different versions are therefore not directly comparable.
AnTuTu's device ranking (antutu.com/web/ranking) shows AnTuTu 12 totals from its 2026.9 edition on. Its figures are AnTuTu's averages for each model, not one unit's run.
How we counted
- The sample is every phone and tablet in the InnoReviews catalog that holds both an AnTuTu 11 ranking row (the total with its CPU / GPU / Memory / UX breakdown) and an AnTuTu 12 ranking row (the 2026.9 edition): 126 devices. AnTuTu's rankings list mostly popular recent models, so the sample describes those, not the whole market.
- Change is the device's AnTuTu 12 total divided by its AnTuTu 11 total, minus 1. The V11 rows come from the July to September 2026 editions of the ranking, the V12 row from the 2026.9 edition; AnTuTu's averages move a few percent from month to month, so a change within ±3% counts as “about the same”. For some China-market phones the V11 row comes from AnTuTu's China ranking, whose averages run higher than its international one for the same model, so their change can look lower than it is.
- Swaps are counted only within a category (phones with phones, tablets with tablets) and only for pairs whose AnTuTu 11 totals differ by more than 3%.
How to cite this study
Journalists, researchers and anyone else may quote these findings with a link to this page and the date, since the numbers update as AnTuTu publishes new editions. The AnTuTu scores belong to AnTuTu; please credit them too.
InnoReviews. AnTuTu 12 vs AnTuTu 11: how the same phones' scores changed. Figures as of Oct 30, 2026. https://innoreviews.com/data/antutu-12-vs-11
Download the device list (CSV)CC BY 4.0 · names, chipsets, year and the percentage change; not AnTuTu's totals themselves