Oppo Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
46.7Performance86.1
67.2Display61.6
70.3Camera50.2
77Battery67.5
86.7Features94.7
7 spec wins — Oppo Reno162 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 wins this phone face-off, 71.2 to 65.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and features (+8). Oppo Reno16 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Oppo Reno16
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 62
- Stronger camera score: 70 vs 50
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 68
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger performance score: 86 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 20% higher Screen size: 7.6 ″ vs 6.32 ″
Display
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 7.6 ″+20% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2448x1848 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+14% | 404 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+20% | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,947,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,528Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,619Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 53 %Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | — |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+40% | 4,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 20 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 182 g+9% | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+15% | 9.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno16vs iPhone 17VSOppo Reno16vs Huawei Mate 70 AirVSOppo Reno16vs Asus ROG Phone 9VSOppo Reno16vs Huawei nova 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS