Skip to content
InnoReviews

Oppo Reno16 vs vivo X Fold3 Pro

Oppo Reno16
65.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X Fold3 Pro
67Inno Score
46.7Performance54.5
67.2Display71.4
70.3Camera66.4
77Battery82.5
86.7Features65.3
6 spec wins — Oppo Reno165 spec wins — vivo X Fold3 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Oppo Reno16 scores 65.6 against 67 for vivo X Fold3 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — vivo X Fold3 Pro edges ahead in performance and battery, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Oppo Reno16

  • Stronger camera score: 70 vs 66
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 65
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 27% lower thickness: 8.2 mm vs 11.2 mm
  • 23% lower weight: 182 g vs 236 g

Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold3 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 55 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 71 vs 67
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 77
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28% higher telephoto: 64 MP vs 50 MP

Display

Display comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
Screen size6.32 ″8.03 ″+27%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution1216x26402200x2480
Pixel density460 ppi+12%412 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits4,500 nits+25%
Screen-to-body—90.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,193Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—6,791Top 25%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP64 MP+28%
Optical zoom3.5 x+17%3 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
Capacity6,700 mAh+18%5,700 mAh
Wired charging80 W100 W+25%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—13.4 h

Design

Design comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
Weight182 g+23%236 g
Thickness8.2 mm+27%11.2 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69/IP69KIPX8
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USB—USB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge—3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Oppo Reno16 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecOppo Reno16vivo X Fold3 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup