Oppo Reno16 vs Vivo X200 Pro
28.9Performance74.5
67.2Display73.2
70.3Camera72
77Battery79.9
86.7Features78.7
5 spec wins — Oppo Reno166 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and display (+6). Oppo Reno16 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Oppo Reno16
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 79
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 15% lower weight: 190 g vs 223 g
- 12% higher capacity: 6,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $699 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
- 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 25% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,600 nits
Display
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.78 ″+7% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 4,500 nits+25% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 2,550,000Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,800Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,600Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 3.7 x+6% |
| Max video | — | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+12% | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W+13% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g+15% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+4% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Oppo Reno16 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |