Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs POCO F8 Ultra

OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
POCO F8 Ultra

Xiaomi

POCO F8 Ultra

$729

80.1Inno Score
57.3Performance88.4
54.9Display67
42.8Camera69.5
74.3Battery92
60Features78.7
4 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 87 spec wins — POCO F8 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F8 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 80.1 to 57.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+31) and camera (+27). OSCAL PILOT 8 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 54% higher capacity: 10,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh

Reasons to pick the POCO F8 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 57
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 55
  • Stronger camera score: 70 vs 43
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 74
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
Screen size6.83 ″6.9 ″+1%
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1280x27721200x2608
Pixel density446 ppi+7%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits3,500 nits+75%
Screen-to-body86 %91.8 %+7%

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,151,9343,651,476Top 4%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,047,154Top 5%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,371,829Top 5%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—485,909Top 4%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—746,584Top 5%
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,550Top 5%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,502Top 5%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB256GB / 512GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—5 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
Capacity10,000 mAh+54%6,500 mAh
Wired charging55 W100 W+82%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—18.9 h

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
Weight389 g218 g+44%
Thickness17.9 mm7.9 mm+56%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68
Frame materialAluminum alloyAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.06.0
NFC—Yes
USB—USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus POCO F8 Ultra
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8POCO F8 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup