Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

WINNER
OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
57.3Performance27.1
54.9Display34.4
42.8Camera30.1
74.3Battery43.7
60Features49.3
11 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 82 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

InnoReviews verdict

OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+31) and performance (+30). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • Stronger performance score: 57 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 49

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 56% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 17.9 mm
  • 49% lower weight: 200 g vs 389 g

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Screen size6.83 ″+2%6.7 ″
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1280x27721080x2340
Pixel density446 ppi+16%385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits+173%733 nits
Screen-to-body86 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,151,934510,132Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—211,597Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,559Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,374Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,602Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (single)—728Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,943Bottom 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability—96 %Top 47%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB128/256GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Ultra-wide—5 MP
Max video—1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OIS—No

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Capacity10,000 mAh+100%5,000 mAh
Wired charging55 W+120%25 W

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Weight389 g200 g+49%
Thickness17.9 mm7.9 mm+56%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP54
Frame materialAluminum alloyPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFC—Yes
USB—USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—6 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Stereo speakers—No
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup