Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

WINNER
OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
39.1Inno Score
57.3Performance27.1
54.9Display36.6
42.8Camera30.1
74.3Battery55.7
60Features65.3
11 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 82 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

InnoReviews verdict

OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+30) and battery (+19). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • Stronger performance score: 57 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 37
  • Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 56
  • 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
  • 56% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 17.9 mm
  • 49% lower weight: 200 g vs 389 g

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Screen size6.83 ″+2%6.7 ″
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1280x27721080x2340
Pixel density446 ppi+16%385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits+150%800 nits
Screen-to-body86 %+1%85.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,151,934509,232Bottom 2%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—210,242Bottom 5%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,774Bottom 4%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,272Bottom 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,944Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (single)—740Bottom 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,050Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB128/256GB

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Ultra-wide—5 MP
Optical zoom—1 x
Max video—1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OIS—No

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Capacity10,000 mAh+100%5,000 mAh
Wired charging55 W+120%25 W
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Weight389 g200 g+49%
Thickness17.9 mm7.9 mm+56%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP54
Frame materialAluminum alloyPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFC—Yes
USB—USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—6 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Stereo speakers—No
3.5mm jack—Yes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup