Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
57.3Performance20
54.9Display36
42.8Camera33.1
74.3Battery38.8
60Features38.7
12 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 82 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+37) and battery (+36). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • Stronger performance score: 57 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 43 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 53% lower weight: 184 g vs 389 g
  • 53% lower thickness: 8.4 mm vs 17.9 mm

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size6.83 ″+7%6.4 ″
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1280x27722400x1080
Pixel density446 ppi+9%411 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits+150%800 nits
Screen-to-body86 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690MediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu1,151,934+343%260,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—410Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,320Bottom 2%
RAM (max)12 GB+100%6 GB
Storage options256GB64GB / 128GB
Storage type—eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera108 MP+69%64 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Ultra-wide—8 MP
Max video—4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+150%20 MP
OIS—No

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity10,000 mAh+100%5,000 mAh
Wired charging55 W+267%15 W

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight389 g184 g+53%
Thickness17.9 mm8.4 mm+53%
IP ratingIP68/IP69K—
Frame materialAluminum alloyPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.0
NFC—Yes
USB—USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakers—No
3.5mm jack—Yes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup