OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A35
57.3Performance31.4
54.9Display45.3
42.8Camera41.9
74.3Battery55.7
60Features70.7
10 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 82 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+26) and battery (+19). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8
- Stronger performance score: 57 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 45
- Stronger battery score: 74 vs 56
- 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
- 120% higher Wired charging: 55 W vs 25 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger features score: 71 vs 60
- 54% lower thickness: 8.2 mm vs 17.9 mm
- 46% lower weight: 209 g vs 389 g
Display
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.83 ″+3% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | Flexible AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi+14% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits+100% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86 %+1% | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6690 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,151,934 | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
Camera
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 10,000 mAh+100% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 55 W+120% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 389 g | 209 g+46% |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 8.2 mm+54% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum alloy | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (DokeOS 5.0) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |