OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
57.3Performance34.7
54.9Display46.2
42.8Camera41.7
74.3Battery52.5
60Features89.3
7 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 82 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 47.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+23) and battery (+22). Samsung Galaxy A36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8
- Stronger performance score: 57 vs 35
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 46
- Stronger battery score: 74 vs 53
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 60
- 59% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 17.9 mm
- 50% lower weight: 195 g vs 389 g
Display
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.83 ″+2% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | Flexible AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi+16% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits+67% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6690 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,151,934 | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,902Bottom 35% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Max video | — | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 10,000 mAh+100% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 55 W+22% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 0 W |
Design
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 389 g | 195 g+50% |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 7.4 mm+59% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum alloy | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (DokeOS 5.0) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
OSCAL PILOT 8vs iQOO Z10VSOSCAL PILOT 8vs Nothing Phone (4a)VSOSCAL PILOT 8vs realme P4 Pro 5GVSOSCAL PILOT 8vs REDMI Note 15 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS