OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
57.3Performance29.1
54.9Display55.1
42.8Camera56.4
74.3Battery41.7
60Features73.3
5 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 84 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
OSCAL PILOT 8 wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+33) and performance (+28). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8
- Stronger performance score: 57 vs 29
- Stronger battery score: 74 vs 42
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 130% higher AnTuTu: 1,151,934 vs 500,000
- 122% higher capacity: 10,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 43
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 55% lower thickness: 8.1 mm vs 17.9 mm
- 47% lower weight: 208 g vs 389 g
- 11% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 446 ppi
Display
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.83 ″ | 6.9 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Flexible AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 496 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits+33% | 1,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6690 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | 1,151,934+130% | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | — | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 10,000 mAh+122% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 55 W+120% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 389 g | 208 g+47% |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 8.1 mm+55% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum alloy | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (DokeOS 5.0) | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OSCAL PILOT 8 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
OSCAL PILOT 8vs iQOO Z10VSOSCAL PILOT 8vs Nothing Phone (4a)VSOSCAL PILOT 8vs realme P4 Pro 5GVSOSCAL PILOT 8vs REDMI Note 15 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS