Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
58.4Inno Score
57.3Performance60.9
54.9Display58.6
42.8Camera46.9
74.3Battery47.9
60Features94.7
5 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 86 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: OSCAL PILOT 8 scores 57.6 against 58.4 for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 edges ahead in features and camera, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 48
  • 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 127% higher capacity: 10,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • 120% higher Wired charging: 55 W vs 25 W
  • 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

  • Stronger performance score: 61 vs 57
  • Stronger display score: 59 vs 55
  • Stronger camera score: 47 vs 43
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
  • 58% higher AnTuTu: 1,820,000 vs 1,151,934

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Screen size6.83 ″7.6 ″+11%
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution1280x27721856x2160
Pixel density446 ppi+19%374 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits2,600 nits+30%
Screen-to-body86 %90.5 %+5%

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
AnTuTu1,151,9341,820,000+58%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,270Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—7,000Top 23%
RAM (max)12 GB12 GB
Storage options256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+400%10 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Capacity10,000 mAh+127%4,400 mAh
Wired charging55 W+120%25 W
Wireless charging—15 W
Active use endurance—10 h

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Weight389 g239 g+39%
Thickness17.9 mm12.1 mm+32%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP48
Frame materialAluminum alloyArmor Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFC—Yes
USB—USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1)
OS update pledge—7 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup