Skip to content
InnoReviews

OSCAL PILOT 8 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

WINNER
OSCAL PILOT 8
57.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
57.3Performance64.4
54.9Display43.7
42.8Camera55.7
74.3Battery60.8
60Features60
5 spec wins — OSCAL PILOT 85 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: OSCAL PILOT 8 scores 57.6 against 57.4 for Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OSCAL PILOT 8 edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OSCAL PILOT 8

  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 61
  • 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 79% higher capacity: 10,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • 66% higher Pixel density: 446 ppi vs 269 ppi

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 57
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 43
  • 85% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 108 MP
  • 46% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.83 ″
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Display

Display comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.83 ″10 ″+46%
Panel typeFlexible AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution1280x27722160x1584
Pixel density446 ppi+66%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits+25%1,600 nits
Screen-to-body86 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetQualcomm QCM6690Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTu1,151,934—
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB512GB/1TB

Camera

Camera comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera108 MP200 MP+85%
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Front camera50 MP+400%10 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity10,000 mAh+79%5,600 mAh
Wired charging55 W+22%45 W
Wireless charging—15 W

Design

Design comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight389 g309 g+21%
Thickness17.9 mm12.9 mm+28%
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP48
Frame materialAluminum alloyTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
USB—USB-C
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OSCAL PILOT 8 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecOSCAL PILOT 8Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 16 (DokeOS 5.0)Android 16 (One UI 8)

Related comparisons

Try another matchup