Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO C85 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

X
36.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
58.4Inno Score
21.8Performance60.9
44.1Display58.6
29Camera46.9
57.3Battery47.9
36Features94.7
5 spec wins — POCO C85 5G14 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 wins this phone face-off, 58.4 to 36.2, pulling ahead mainly in features (+59) and performance (+39). POCO C85 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO C85 5G

  • Stronger battery score: 57 vs 48
  • 36% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • 34% lower thickness: 8 mm vs 12.1 mm
  • 32% higher Wired charging: 33 W vs 25 W
  • 12% lower weight: 211 g vs 239 g

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

  • Stronger performance score: 61 vs 22
  • Stronger display score: 59 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 47 vs 29
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 36
  • 257% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,000 vs 1,960

Display

Display comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Screen size6.9 ″7.6 ″+10%
Panel typeIPS LCDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution720x16001856x2160
Pixel density254 ppi374 ppi+47%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness810 nits2,600 nits+221%
Screen-to-body89.9 %90.5 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
AnTuTu—1,820,000
Geekbench 6 (single)726Bottom 13%2,270+213%Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,960Bottom 15%7,000+257%Top 23%
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options128GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera8 MP10 MP+25%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Capacity6,000 mAh+36%4,400 mAh
Wired charging33 W+32%25 W
Wireless charging0 W15 W
Active use endurance—10 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Weight211 g+12%239 g
Thickness8 mm+34%12.1 mm
IP ratingIP64IP48
Frame material—Armor Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCNoYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
OS at launchAndroid 15 (HyperOS)Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1)
OS update pledge2 years7 years+250%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO C85 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
SpecPOCO C85 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup