Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F4 GT vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

WINNER
POCO F4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
VS
TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
47.1Inno Score
45.4Performance28.9
44.1Display77.8
33.1Camera30.1
64.2Battery54.3
60Features60
5 spec wins — POCO F4 GT7 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: POCO F4 GT scores 47.9 against 47.1 for TECNO SPARK 40 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — POCO F4 GT edges ahead in performance and battery, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • Stronger performance score: 45 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 33 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 64 vs 54
  • 167% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 45 W
  • 54% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 13 MP

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

  • Stronger display score: 78 vs 44
  • 463% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 800 nits
  • 21% lower thickness: 6.7 mm vs 8.5 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 19% lower weight: 170 g vs 210 g

Display

Display comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.78 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution2400x10801224x2720
Pixel density395 ppi440 ppi+11%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—89.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate
AnTuTu1,150,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,720Top 40%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,300Top 44%—
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options128GB / 256GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9—
Ultra-wide8 MP—
Max video4K@60fps1440p@30fps
Front camera20 MP+54%13 MP
OISNo—

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Capacity4,700 mAh5,200 mAh+11%
Wired charging120 W+167%45 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Weight210 g170 g+19%
Thickness8.5 mm6.7 mm+21%
IP rating—IP64
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth5.2—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNo—

Software

Software comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 15 (HiOS 15)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F4 GT versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTTECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup