Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F4 GT vs vivo X Fold3 Pro

POCO F4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X Fold3 Pro
67Inno Score
45.4Performance54.5
44.1Display71.4
33.1Camera66.4
64.2Battery82.5
60Features65.3
4 spec wins — POCO F4 GT11 spec wins — vivo X Fold3 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins this phone face-off, 67 to 47.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+33) and display (+27). POCO F4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 24% lower thickness: 8.5 mm vs 11.2 mm
  • 20% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 100 W
  • 11% lower weight: 210 g vs 236 g

Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold3 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 55 vs 45
  • Stronger display score: 71 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 64
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″8.03 ″+20%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10802200x2480
Pixel density395 ppi412 ppi+4%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—90.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
AnTuTu1,150,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,720Top 40%2,193+28%Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,300Top 44%6,791+58%Top 25%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.68
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—64 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP32 MP+60%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
Capacity4,700 mAh5,700 mAh+21%
Wired charging120 W+20%100 W
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—13.4 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
Weight210 g+11%236 g
Thickness8.5 mm+24%11.2 mm
IP rating—IPX8
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge2 years3 years+50%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X Fold3 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup