Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F4 GT vs Vivo X200 Pro

X

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
45.4Performance74.5
44.1Display73.2
33.1Camera72
64.2Battery79.9
60Features78.7
3 spec wins — POCO F4 GT13 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 47.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+39) and performance (+29). POCO F4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • 33% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 90 W
  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • Lower launch price: $599 vs $1,099

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 75 vs 45
  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 72 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 64
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.78 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801260x2800
Pixel density395 ppi452 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu 101,150,000Top 37%2,550,000+122%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,720Top 43%2,800+63%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,300Top 45%8,600+100%Top 8%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto200 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP32 MP+60%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
Capacity4,700 mAh6,000 mAh+28%
Wired charging120 W+33%90 W
Wireless charging30 W
Active use endurance13 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
Weight210 g+6%223 g
Thickness8.5 mm8.5 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge2 years4 years+100%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecPOCO F4 GTVivo X200 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup