Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F4 GT vs vivo X200 Pro mini

POCO F4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Pro mini
72.8Inno Score
45.4Performance71.3
44.1Display73.8
33.1Camera65.5
64.2Battery74.7
60Features86.7
3 spec wins — POCO F4 GT11 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 47.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and display (+30). POCO F4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • 33% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 90 W
  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini

  • Stronger performance score: 71 vs 45
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 75 vs 64
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
Screen size6.67 ″+6%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801216x2640
Pixel density395 ppi460 ppi+16%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—90.5 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,150,0002,439,691Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—716,503Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—837,229Top 29%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—328,282Top 35%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—557,677Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,720Top 40%2,589+51%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,300Top 44%8,078+88%Top 18%
Wild Life Extreme stability—48 %Bottom 7%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@60fps4K@60fps
Front camera20 MP32 MP+60%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
Capacity4,700 mAh5,700 mAh+21%
Wired charging120 W+33%90 W
Wireless charging—30 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
Weight210 g187 g+11%
Thickness8.5 mm8.2 mm+4%
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F4 GT versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecPOCO F4 GTvivo X200 Pro mini
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup