POCO F7 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
77.5Performance29.1
68.5Display55.1
60.7Camera56.4
78.7Battery41.7
70.7Features73.3
12 spec wins — POCO F7 Ultra6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
POCO F7 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 71.9 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+37). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO F7 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 69 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 79 vs 42
- 380% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 25 W
- Lower launch price: $649 vs $1,299
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 2.5 x
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.9 ″+3% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi+6% | 496 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits+113% | 1,500 nits |
Performance
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,932,885Top 17% | 500,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 848,069Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,066,050Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 415,854Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 602,912Top 19% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,959+229%Top 15% | 900Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,711+229%Top 15% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 70 %Bottom 40% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2.5 x | 5 x+100% |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,300 mAh+18% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 120 W+380% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 212 g | 208 g+2% |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.1 mm+3% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years+33% | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
POCO F7 Ultravs Honor 500VSPOCO F7 Ultravs vivo X100 UltraVSPOCO F7 Ultravs Asus ROG Phone 9 ProVSPOCO F7 Ultravs Honor Magic V Flip2VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs OPPO K13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs OPPO Reno11 5GVS