Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F7 vs vivo X200 Ultra

POCO F7

Xiaomi

POCO F7

$399

60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
61.1Performance74.3
53.5Display76.1
43.4Camera75.8
76.9Battery82.8
70.7Features86.7
4 spec wins — POCO F77 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and display (+23). POCO F7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F7

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 61
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 54
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 43
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 77
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.83 ″6.82 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2772x12801440x3168
Pixel density447 ppi510 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,700 nits4,500 nits+165%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu2,205,378Top 35%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)618,105Top 40%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)777,545Top 33%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)365,752Top 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)443,976Top 42%—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,050Top 32%3,062+49%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)6,850Top 25%9,410+37%Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.6f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
Capacity6,500 mAh+8%6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W90 W
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
Weight216 g+7%232 g
Thickness8.2 mm+6%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 15 (HyperOS 2)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F7 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecPOCO F7vivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup