Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A35

WINNER
POCO F8 Pro

Xiaomi

POCO F8 Pro

$579

74.4Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
79.2Performance31.4
65.4Display45.3
53.1Camera41.9
84.7Battery55.7
100Features70.7
17 spec wins — POCO F8 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F8 Pro wins this phone face-off, 74.4 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and features (+29). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F8 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 79 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 65 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 53 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 85 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 71

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Lower launch price: $399 vs $579

Display

Display comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.59 ″6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1156x25101080x2340
Pixel density419 ppi+7%390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,500 nits+250%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body89.8 %+6%84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteSamsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu 113,024,818+307%Top 14%743,075Bottom 15%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)884,351+202%Top 14%292,456Bottom 19%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)1,125,566+1180%Top 15%87,904Bottom 15%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)408,540+206%Top 16%133,634Bottom 8%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)606,361+165%Top 17%229,081Bottom 19%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,050Bottom 36%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,950Bottom 37%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom2.5 x+150%1 x
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera20 MP+54%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity6,210 mAh+24%5,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging0 W0 W
Active use endurance17.6 h+47%12 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight199 g+5%209 g
Thickness8 mm+2%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68IP67
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F8 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F8 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup