Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

WINNER
POCO F8 Ultra

Xiaomi

POCO F8 Ultra

$729

80.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
43.6Inno Score
88.4Performance28.9
67Display44.4
69.5Camera41.9
92Battery53.1
78.7Features70.7
12 spec wins — POCO F8 Ultra0 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F8 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 80.1 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+60) and battery (+39). Samsung Galaxy M35 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F8 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 70 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 53
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 71

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
Screen size6.9 ″+5%6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1200x26081080x2340
Pixel density416 ppi+7%390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,500 nits+250%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body91.8 %+10%83.8 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Samsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu3,651,476Top 4%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)1,047,154Top 5%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)1,371,829Top 5%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)485,909Top 4%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)746,584Top 5%—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,550Top 6%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,502Top 5%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom5 x—
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
Capacity6,500 mAh+8%6,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging50 W—
Active use endurance18.9 h—

Design

Design comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
Weight218 g+2%222 g
Thickness7.9 mm+13%9.1 mm
IP ratingIP68—
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy M35 5G
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup