Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F8 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G

WINNER
POCO F8 Ultra

Xiaomi

POCO F8 Ultra

$729

80.1Inno Score
VS
Tecno Camon Slim 4G
47.5Inno Score
88.4Performance28.9
67Display73
69.5Camera34.1
92Battery62.4
78.7Features49.3
8 spec wins — POCO F8 Ultra3 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F8 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 80.1 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+60) and camera (+35). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F8 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 70 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 49
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G

  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 19% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.9 mm

Display

Display comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
Screen size6.9 ″+2%6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1200x26081224x2720
Pixel density416 ppi440 ppi+6%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness3,500 nits—
Screen-to-body91.8 %+5%87.7 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate
AnTuTu3,651,476Top 4%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)1,047,154Top 5%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)1,371,829Top 5%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)485,909Top 4%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)746,584Top 5%—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,550Top 6%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,502Top 5%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom5 x—
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera32 MP32 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
Capacity6,500 mAh+16%5,600 mAh
Wired charging100 W+67%60 W
Wireless charging50 W—
Active use endurance18.9 h—

Design

Design comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
Weight218 g—
Thickness7.9 mm6.4 mm+19%
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth6.0—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 16 (HiOS 16.2)
OS update pledge4 years+33%3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F8 Ultra versus Tecno Camon Slim 4G
SpecPOCO F8 UltraTecno Camon Slim 4G
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup