Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A35

WINNER
POCO F9 Pro

POCO

POCO F9 Pro

$699

79.9Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
83.8Performance31.4
84.5Display45.3
64.4Camera41.9
85.7Battery55.7
78.7Features70.7
14 spec wins — POCO F9 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Pro wins this phone face-off, 79.9 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+52) and display (+39). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 84 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 64 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 71

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Lower launch price: $399 vs $699

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.59 ″6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2510x11561080x2340
Pixel density419 ppi+7%390 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+350%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body—84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V SeriesSamsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared3,351,073743,075Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—292,456Bottom 21%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,904Bottom 18%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—133,634Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—229,081Bottom 21%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,411+225%Top 7%1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,347+251%Top 6%2,950Bottom 38%
Wild Life Extreme stability91 %Top 49%—
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom2.5 x+150%1 x
Max video4K@60fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity6,330 mAh+27%5,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging50 W0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight206 g+1%209 g
Thickness8.8 mm8.2 mm+7%
IP ratingIP68IP67
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFCYesYes
USB—USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup