Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25

WINNER
POCO F9 Pro

POCO

POCO F9 Pro

$699

79.9Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25
64.1Inno Score
83.8Performance75.3
84.5Display61.3
64.4Camera47.3
85.7Battery51.4
78.7Features94.7
12 spec wins — POCO F9 Pro5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Pro wins this phone face-off, 79.9 to 64.1, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+34) and display (+23). Samsung Galaxy S25 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 84 vs 75
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 61
  • Stronger camera score: 64 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 51
  • 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • Lower launch price: $699 vs $800

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25

  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 79
  • 75% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 4 years
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
  • 21% lower weight: 162 g vs 206 g
  • 20% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2.5 x

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Screen size6.59 ″+6%6.2 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution2510x11561080x2340
Pixel density419 ppi+1%416 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+73%2,600 nits
Screen-to-body—91.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V SeriesSnapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared3,351,0732,578,555Top 27%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—792,959Top 25%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—925,248Top 24%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—331,698Top 33%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—528,650Top 32%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,411+16%Top 7%2,950Top 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,347+10%Top 6%9,400Top 12%
Wild Life Extreme stability91 %Top 49%—
RAM (max)12 GB12 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB128/256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.8
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto50 MP+400%10 MP
Optical zoom2.5 x3 x+20%
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+167%12 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Capacity6,330 mAh+58%4,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging50 W+233%15 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Weight206 g162 g+21%
Thickness8.8 mm7.2 mm+18%
IP ratingIP68IP68
Frame materialAluminumArmor Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USB—USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 15 (One UI 7)
OS update pledge4 years7 years+75%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy S25
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup