Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

WINNER
POCO F9 Ultra
78.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
45.6Inno Score
64.4Performance43.2
84.3Display44.9
78.2Camera41.9
92Battery43.7
78.7Features65.3
12 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 78.1 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+48) and display (+39). Samsung Galaxy A26 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 43
  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 65

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

  • 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years
  • 15% lower weight: 200 g vs 235 g
  • 12% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • Lower launch price: $300 vs $799

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
Screen size6.9 ″+3%6.7 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2608x12001080x2340
Pixel density416 ppi+8%385 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+350%1,000 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Exynos 1380
AnTuTu—754,064Bottom 20%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—294,711Bottom 22%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,552Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—138,545Bottom 10%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—233,256Bottom 24%
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom5 x+400%1 x
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
Capacity8,050 mAh+61%5,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging50 W—

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
Weight235 g200 g+15%
Thickness8.7 mm7.7 mm+12%
IP ratingIP68IP67

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 15 (One UI 7)
OS update pledge4 years6 years+50%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A26 5G
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup